Our firm represents clients in litigation and handles every stage on their behalf: gathering evidence, studying the case, filing the claim, drafting statements of claim and memoranda, submitting requests through the approved electronic systems, including the Najiz platform, attending hearings, and following up on the enforcement of judgments. We appear before the general courts, commercial courts, personal status courts and labor courts, the administrative courts of the Board of Grievances, and quasi-judicial committees. Our services also include case assessment, strategy development, negotiation and alternative dispute resolution, tailored to each client’s needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
First-instance courts of the general judiciary are divided by type of dispute into general courts, criminal courts, personal status courts, labor courts and commercial courts. Under Article 8 of its Law, the courts of the Board of Grievances consist of the High Administrative Court, the administrative courts of appeal and the administrative courts.
Article 18 of the Law Practice Code, as amended by Royal Decree No. M/21 dated 26/1/1447H, restricts the right to plead on behalf of others before the courts, the Board of Grievances or the committees referred to in the Code to lawyers registered on the roll of practitioners, with specific exceptions, including a spouse, an in-law or a relative up to the fourth degree, and the statutory representative of a legal person.
Under Article 13 of the Board of Grievances Law, the administrative courts decide cases including actions to annul final administrative decisions, claims for compensation for decisions or acts of the administration, and disputes over contracts to which the administration is a party.
Yes. Article 2 of the Implementing Regulations on Methods of Objection to Judgments provides that requests are submitted and procedures taken through the electronic systems approved by the Ministry of Justice, and Najiz is the Ministry’s platform for electronic judicial services.
No. Paragraph (3) of Rule 16 of the Code of Professional Conduct for Lawyers provides that a lawyer may not promise a result that is beyond the lawyer’s control or that cannot be guaranteed. The lawyer exercises due care and reasonable effort within the scope of the engagement and the standards of the profession.